J.P. Morgan Bank Faces Criminal Charges

I've been covering JP Morgan Chase Bank for a long time, and there is just so much wrong with the way they do business! But because CEO Jamie Dimon is slippery and charismatic, they have drifted along without legal consequences even while making shady deals (The London Whale) and losing tons of money for their investors.

Let's face it - we need accountability to have closure for what happened in 2008 when the stock market crashed. And these Wall Street banks are still playing fast and loose with OUR money! As Elizabeth Warren said, "Too big to fail has become too big for trial."

Previous Posts:
May 12, 2012: The London Whale
May 18, 2012: JP Morgan Fall-Out Continues
June 14, 2012: Dimon Cozies Up to Senate Banking Committee
March 17, 2013: Senate Grills JP Morgan Bank

Now JP Morgan is under criminal investigation from both Federal and State Officials:

From Huffington Post

The Justice Department told JPMorgan in May that prosecutors had “preliminarily concluded” that the bank violated civil securities laws related to mortgage securities it packaged and sold from 2005 to 2007, the bank disclosed in a quarterly securities filing. JPMorgan has already been sued over similar practices by Eric Schneiderman, New York attorney general, and has settled similar cases brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
. . . JPMorgan -- once a darling in Washington -- on Wednesday disclosed a raft of expected enforcement actions that have been broadly mentioned by the bank and its chief executive and chairman, Jamie Dimon, but never before in such detail. Once finalized, the enforcement orders may further damage the bank’s already-battered reputation and lead to heightened scrutiny of its practices.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is investigating JPMorgan's collection and sale of delinquent consumer credit card debt, including its use of sworn documents to pursue bad debts. Kamala Harris, California attorney general, has sued the bank over similar practices.

From Reuters

One of the major criticisms by homeowners, investors and politicians is that federal and state investigators have failed to bring criminal charges against high-level executives over lending and securitization activities that contributed to the housing and financial crises. No top executives at large Wall Street or commercial banks have been convicted of criminal charges related to the crises.
"Criminal probes of banks over MBS have been exceedingly rare," said Adam Levitin, a professor at Georgetown Law.

Senate Grills JP Morgan Bank

The saga of the JP Morgan Bank "London Whale" disaster continued last week with the release of a major Senate report and public hearings on Capital Hill.

Previous Related Posts:
Economic News Round-Up ~ The London Whale
JP Morgan Fall-Out Continues
Dimon Cozies Up to Senate Banking Committee
Economic News Round-Up ~ London Whale Leaving JP Morgan

Cnn Money

During a press briefing Thursday, Levin said the investigation of 90,000 documents, and more than 200 phone conversation and instant messages, showed how the bank "ignored limits on risk taking, dodged oversight and misinformed the public."
But the report also criticized regulators at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for not following up on red flags.

From AFP, via Google

Senator Carl Levin, at a hearing on JPMorgan's ill-fated "whale" trades, slammed the bank's trading operation that lost $6.2 billion over just a few months in 2012 as a "runaway train barreling through every risk limit."

"Derivative values that can't be trusted are a serious risk to our financial system," said Levin, the chairman of the Senate subcommittee on investigations.

The incident is a "reminder you just can't rely on a major bank... without a strong regulator looking over," Levin added.

A 300-page report by the subcommittee said that JPMorgan kept adding risky bets on top of earlier ones, hid losses, disregarded its own rules for risk limits, avoided oversight by its regulator and "misinformed" investors, regulators and the public.

Former and current JPMorgan executives testifying at the Senate hearing painted a picture of confusion and disbelief over the scale of the losses, which blindsided the Wall Street powerhouse in the first quarter of last year.

Ina Drew, JPMorgan's chief investment officer at the time with responsibility for the London trading operation which racked up the losses, admitted errors even as she pointed the finger at others.

"I was, and I remain, deeply disappointed and saddened that such significant losses occurred in the business unit I oversaw," said Drew, who resigned last year to take responsibility for the debacle, according to her prepared testimony.

But Drew also pointed a finger at London employees that she said misled her on the scale of the problem and "let me, and the company, down."

Elizabeth Warren Shames Bank Regulators

Senator Elizabeth Warren hit the ground running in her first Banking Committee Hearing. She wasted no time lambasting the spineless regulators who are letting off the big banks with fines and slaps on the wrist instead of taking them to trial. Her goal was to expose the weakness of regulators who see fines as enough penalty for the crimes committed, and she pointed out that when these cases aren't taken to trial then no testimony of wrongdoing is ever put down on the record. So in effect, the bankers get off scott-free without any new information that congress could use to improve the banking system.

Marketwatch

“I want to note that there are district attorneys and U.S. attorneys who are out there everyday squeezing ordinary citizens on sometimes very thin grounds and taking them to trial to ‘make an example,’ as they put it,” she told bank regulators testifying at a Senate Banking Committee hearing. “I am really concerned that too-big-to-fail has become too-big-for-trial.”

. . . Warren acknowledged that trials are expensive but she insisted that if an agency is unwilling to go to trial it is because they are “too timid” or lack resources. She said that the consequence is that if large financial institutions can break the law and “drag in billions” in profits and settle, then they don’t have much incentive to follow the law.

“Every time there is a settlement and not a trial, it means we didn’t have the days and days and days of testimony about what those financial institutions were up to,” Warren said.

Senator Elizabeth Warren at the Feb. 14, 2013 Banking Committee Hearing titled "Wall Street Reform: Oversight of Financial Stability and Consumer and Investor Protections." The witnesses were: The Honorable Mary Miller, Under Secretary for Domestic Finance, U.S. Department of the Treasury; The Honorable Daniel Tarullo, Governor, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; The Honorable Martin Gruenberg, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; The Honorable Tom Curry, Comptroller, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; The Honorable Richard Cordray, Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; The Honorable Elisse Walter, Chairman, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; and The Honorable Gary Gensler, Chairman, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Romney Runs from Tax Transparency

Yesterday Mitt Romney was interviewed by ABC News and said this about his taxes:

"From time to time I’ve been audited — as it happens, I think, to other citizens as well — and the accounting firm which prepares my taxes has done a very thorough and complete job, pay[ing] taxes as legally due."
. . . "I don't pay more than are legally due and frankly if I had paid more than are legally due I don't think I'd be qualified to become president. I'd think people would want me to follow the law and pay only what the tax code requires."
. . . "I haven't looked at the tax rate paid year by year. I know that I pay a very substantial amount of taxes and [have] every year since the beginning of my career, so far as I can recall."

Yep, there you have it . . . "so far as he can recall."

It never ceases to amaze me that a man running on his sterling background in business and high finance can be so blatantly obtuse and vague about his own personal finances.

That interview must have raised new questions and we know how much Mitt hates those, so he must have put his little foot down. Ann Romney will get the last word when she said "We've given all you people need to know" about their income taxes. As of today, they just aren't going to answer any more of these persnickety tax questions, so there!

Now all you journalists and snoopy people, please slink out the back servant's door and leave us alone in our counting house!

CNN Reporting:

Mitt Romney's campaign said Monday they would not release any more of the candidate's personal income tax information, despite an acknowledgement from Romney that he had been audited in the past.

"Mitt Romney has paid his taxes in full compliance with U.S. Law, and he has paid 100 percent of what he has owed," Romney spokesman Ryan Williams wrote.

. . . He continued, "As has previously been reported, in 2011, the Romneys will pay more than $3.2 million in taxes on $20.9 million in mostly investment income and will have donated more than $4 million to charity. In 2010, The Romneys paid more than $3 million in taxes on $21.6 million in mostly investment income and donated nearly $3 million to charity."

Romney has disclosed his income tax returns from 2010, and released an estimate of his 2011 tax information in April. He has vowed to release 2011's full return one it's completed by his accountant.

Economic News Round-Up

Scranton, PA, Cuts Worker Pay to Minimum Wage

Unions representing civil servants in Scranton, Pa., filed suit Tuesday after the mayor cut pay for police, firefighters, garbage collectors and other public workers to minimum wage, saying that was all the city could afford. Unions representing police, fire and public workers in the city of 76,000 filed three lawsuits after the city defied a judge's order and issued paychecks Friday that paid 398 city employees at the minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, according to the Scranton Times-Tribune.

The lawsuits against Mayor Chris Doherty include one filed in federal court under the Fair Labor Standards Act accusing the city of failing to pay wages on time and failing to pay overtime. Another lawsuit seeks to hold the mayor in contempt for violating a judges order. Yet another alleges that benefits for disabled police and firefighters were cut without a hearing.

Bloomberg Interview with Warren Buffet   He says Euro will fail without rule changes in European banking: "It can't survive with the present rules - that's what they're learning. So the question is, can seventeen countries get together in a way to essentially re-do something in some fundamental ways that require much closer cooperation when they're individual conditions are so different." On the Supreme Court Health Care Ruling: "A lot of businessmen complain about corporate taxes. Corporate taxes are less than 2% of GDP. So if you eliminated all of corporate taxes, you've got seven points against you on health care. It's the tapeworm essentially of the American economy and we've not dealt with that yet. Obamacare is a step in the right direction." Many More Quotes from Buffett on CNBC Robert Reich explains the LIBOR scandal

. . . We trust that the banking system is setting today’s rate based on its best guess about the future worth of the money. And we assume that guess is based, in turn, on the cumulative market predictions of countless lenders and borrowers all over the world about the future supply and demand for the dough. But suppose our assumption is wrong. Suppose the bankers are manipulating the interest rate so they can place bets with the money you lend or repay them . . . . . . Sad to say, there’s reason to believe this has been going on, or something very much like it. This is what the emerging scandal over “Libor” (short for “London interbank offered rate”) is all about. Libor is the benchmark for trillions of dollars of loans worldwide – mortgage loans, small-business loans, personal loans. It’s compiled by averaging the rates at which the major banks say they borrow. So far, the scandal has been limited to Barclay’s, a big London-based bank that just paid $453 million to U.S. and British bank regulators, whose top executives have been forced to resign, and whose traders’ emails give a chilling picture of how easily they got their colleagues to rig interest rates in order to make big bucks. (Robert Diamond, Jr., the former Barclay CEO who was forced to resign, said the emails made him “physically ill” – perhaps because they so patently reveal the corruption.) But Wall Street has almost surely been involved in the same practice, including the usual suspects — JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Bank of America – because every major bank participates in setting the Libor rate, and Barclay’s couldn’t have rigged it without their witting involvement. In fact, Barclay’s defense has been that every major bank was fixing Libor in the same way, and for the same reason. And Barclays is “cooperating” (i.e., giving damning evidence about other big banks) with the Justice Department and other regulators in order to avoid steeper penalties or criminal prosecutions, so the fireworks have just begun. ~ more at link~ 

London Whale Leaving JP Morgan

Bruno Iksil, the JPMorgan Chase trader known as the "London Whale" has left the bank in the wake of a trading scandal, a person familiar with the situation said. Iksil's departure had been widely expected after he became the focus of attention in the trading scandal, because of the huge positions he took in credit markets. Achilles Macris, who headed CIO in Europe, and a third colleague, Martin Javier-Artajo, were also no longer listed in the company's internal employment database as of Thursday, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier on Friday.

JP Morgan's Profits Fell 8.9%

Overall, the bank's second-quarter earnings fell 8.7% from the year-ago quarter, as the bank saw a 16% decline in revenue. J.P. Morgan has been in the spotlight since early April as its outsized, complex trades on derivatives tied to corporate bonds came under intense scrutiny. The Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission are investigating the trading loss, which has played into the Washington political and policy battle over the shape of financial overhaul. Just prior to releasing its results early Friday, the bank said it would reduce its previously reported first-quarter profit by 8.5%, or $459 million, on valuations of certain positions in the chief investment office's synthetic credit portfolio. It said there was "a material weakness" in its internal control over financial reporting for the first quarter, and its internal review is continuing.

Dimon Cozies Up to Senate Banking Committee

Confident Much?

JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon got a warm and fuzzy welcome from the Senate Banking Committee. In fact, they rolled out the red carpet for the notorious banker who just lost billions due to the "London Whale" hedge fund debacle now being investigated by the FBI. Senators were falling all over themselves asking softball questions, while Dimon sailed calmly through it and offered only non-apology apologies while his stock rose on Wall Street.

He knew he didn't have to show any real remorse because JP Morgan was a donor to everyone in the room including the Banking Committee Chairman. They are all in bed together.
New York Post called this The Cozy and the Clueless:

“We have let a lot of people down, and we are sorry for it,” Dimon told the committee, which says it wants to know if the company is taking abnormal risk that could come back to bite taxpayers.
In other words, was JPMorgan gambling instead of simply investing when one of its employees — nicknamed the “London Whale” by Wall Street — made trades Dimon said were originally meant as portfolio insurance but turned into something else?
I think it’s telling that this guy was known as a “whale.” That’s what casino high rollers are called in the gambling world. It’s fitting that the folks who were trading against the London Whale knew that he was a gambler but that senators, who have been stalling for years on reforming regulations in the financial industry, are clueless.
Yesterday’s hearing reminded me of when Captain Renault in the movie “Casablanca” goes into Rick’s and feigns shock at what’s going on.
“I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on here,” Renault says, you’ll recall.

On Huffington Post, Bill Moyers called this "Jamie Dimon's 'Family Reunion' With the Senate Banking Committee." His point was that all of the people on both sides of the aisle had either worked for Jamie Dimon or were looking forward to working for him someday. On his PBS Show he said: "This wasn't a hearing, it was a reunion of the Gambino family." LOL